Skip to main content

Minee Monkeys

Minee Monkeys is a day nursery in Oldbury for children aged 0 to 4, with 69 registered places. Ofsted report card, 23 April 2026: Needs attention in 4 areas, Urgent improvement in 2 areas; safeguarding standards not met.

The Old School House, Birchfield Lane, Oldbury, B69 2AS

Key facts

Type
Day nursery (Full day care) (Ofsted childcare register, as at 30 June 2026)
Ages
0 to 4 (Ofsted childcare register, as at 30 June 2026)
Registered places
69 (Ofsted childcare register, as at 30 June 2026)
Registered
25 July 2014 (Ofsted childcare register, as at 30 June 2026)

Opening hours

Monday,Tuesday,Wednesday,Thursday,Friday : 07:00 - 18:00

Source: Ofsted report, inspection on 23 April 2026

Who runs it

Minee Monkeys is run by Minee Monkeys Ltd (Ofsted register).

Latest inspection

  • Inclusion: Needs attention
  • Curriculum and teaching: Needs attention
  • Achievement: Needs attention
  • Behaviour, attitudes and establishing routines: Needs attention
  • Children's welfare and wellbeing: Urgent improvement
  • Leadership and governance: Urgent improvement
  • Safeguarding standards not met

Source: Ofsted, inspection on 23 April 2026. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

What it's like to be a child at this setting

Children's safety and welfare are compromised because leaders have not ensured that all staff understand and follow safeguarding policies and procedures to take appropriate action, when they are worried about a child. Children do not experience a safe and secure environment. Weaknesses in staff deployment and supervision of children mean that they are not always kept safe, including when they are eating. Food is not prepared safely enough to reduce the risk of choking. Babies access some resources that are not safe or suitable for their age and stage of development, which means that their safety cannot be assured during play. These breaches compromise children's health, safety and wellbeing.

Children's learning is variable. Some children enjoy activities and play well alongside others, particularly outdoors. For example, pre-school children concentrate in the mud kitchen, build with construction resources and talk with staff about their play. However, not all children benefit from learning that is matched closely enough to what they need to learn next. Children with special educational needs and/or disabilities receive personalised planning, but this is not always implemented effectively throughout the day. This hinders children's engagement and progress.

Children's daily routines are not organised well enough. In the morning, children spend too much time waiting for snack, lunch and toileting routines. This interrupts the flow of their learning. It reduces the time children have to play, explore and lead their own learning.

Children form warm relationships with staff and often appear settled. Older children cooperate with their peers and show confidence in familiar situations. However, due to weaknesses in staff deployment, staff working with babies are, at times, too stretched to respond effectively to children's care and learning needs. This reduces the quality of interactions children receive and their progress overtime.

What Ofsted found in each area

Inclusion: Needs attention

Leaders do not ensure that children with special educational needs and/or disabilities receive support that is implemented consistently well to meet their needs and reduce barriers to their learning. Staff identify children's needs and complete assessments, but do not use this information precisely enough. Leaders and staff engage with external professionals and put personalised plans in place for children. However, support is not implemented consistently well in practice. Staff do not always adapt teaching and interactions to meet children's individual needs throughout the day. For example, some children are expected to take part in group times that are not developmentally appropriate for their stage of understanding, language development or attention. At times, activities are overly long and staff do not adapt the content or interactions well enough to support children's engagement and participation. Staff approaches are not implemented consistently enough to help children access learning fully. As a result, children's engagement is reduced and they do not make the progress they are capable of.

Leaders do not monitor the impact of support precisely enough or ensure that strategies are reviewed and adapted in a timely way. As a result, support is not tailored closely enough to children's changing needs, and barriers to learning are not reduced as well as they should be.

Leaders use additional funding to provide targeted support for children. For example, they incorporate musical sessions into the curriculum to support children experiencing language delay and to develop their listening skills. This demonstrates the intention to use funding to address identified needs and support children's development. Staff are aware of some children's home languages and use some strategies to support communication, including simplified language.

Curriculum and teaching: Needs attention

Leaders do not ensure that the curriculum is implemented consistently well to support children's learning and development. While a curriculum is in place that covers all areas of learning, leaders do not ensure that teaching is adapted effectively to meet children's individual needs. Staff provide some helpful learning experiences to support children's development. Children engage in role play, such as caring for baby dolls, which helps them make links to their own experiences. Staff also use books as a key teaching tool to support children's language and early literacy development. These experiences support children's enjoyment and engagement in learning.

The quality of teaching is inconsistent. Staff's knowledge of child development is variable and gaps in some staff's understanding mean that learning experiences are not always matched appropriately to children's age and stage of development, particularly for babies. For example, staff provide babies with writing tools that they are not physically ready for. At times, there is an over reliance on adult-led activities, which reduces opportunities for children to lead their own play and learning, especially for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities. For example, staff read books to some children with content and language that is beyond their level of understanding. As a result, children become disengaged and are unable to access the learning intended.

Assessment is not used precisely enough to inform teaching. Staff identify next steps in learning more securely for older children than for babies. For example, activities for babies are not consistently matched to their developmental stage or emerging interests and staff interactions are reduced at times, due to routines and staff deployment. This means that babies are not supported consistently well to develop the communication, attention and independence skills they need for their transition into the toddler room. This variability means that learning is not consistently matched to children's developmental needs or their preparation for the next stage in learning.

Achievement: Needs attention

Children do not consistently develop the knowledge and skills they need across all areas of learning. While some children make progress, this is not secure for all groups of children, especially younger children. As a result, not all children achieve as well as they should from their starting points.

Some older children demonstrate age-appropriate skills. They communicate confidently with others, talk about their experiences and engage in simple imaginative play. They develop a 'can-do' attitude and listen attentively during story time. These skills support their readiness for the next stage of learning. However, this is not consistent across the setting. Babies and younger children do not always develop skills appropriate to their age and stage of development. They do not consistently develop their communication or exploratory skills due to reduced interactions by staff to engage them in purposeful learning.

Children with special educational needs and/or disabilities do not consistently make the progress they are capable of. This is because support is not implemented effectively enough to reduce barriers to their learning, such as to develop their communication and language skills.

Behaviour, attitudes and establishing routines: Needs attention

Leaders do not ensure that daily routines are organised effectively to support children's learning and engagement. At key points in the day, particularly in the morning, children spend too much time waiting during transitions, such as snack, lunch and toileting routines. Although children wait patiently, this reduces the time children have to play, explore and engage in purposeful learning.

Children form positive relationships with staff and their peers. Older children cooperate with one another during play and follow simple expectations, such as sitting at the table and taking turns. Staff support children to begin to regulate their feelings and behaviour and help them understand how their actions impact others. Children attend regularly and leaders communicate with parents to understand and support any absence.

The quality of provision to support children's attitudes to learning is variable. Children are more motivated and engaged, when staff provide learning experiences that are matched to their stage of development. However, this is not consistent across the setting. At some times of the day, particularly for younger children, staff do not provide sufficiently purposeful or well-matched learning experiences. In addition, weaknesses in staff deployment reduce the quality of interactions and support available. At times, some children are not supported effectively to sustain their engagement or develop their attention.

Children's welfare and wellbeing: Urgent improvement

Leaders do not ensure that children's welfare and wellbeing are met effectively. They do not ensure that staff implement policies and procedures, therefore, care and supervision compromises children's safety and places them at risk of harm.

Staff do not supervise children closely enough during mealtimes. This places children at risk of choking, including the risk of silent choking, as staff are not always positioned to observe children directly. While some food is prepared appropriately, safer eating practices are not consistently followed. For example, younger children, including toddlers, are given whole sausages during mealtimes and are expected to manage cutting these independently. However, staff do not consistently consider whether this is developmentally appropriate or adapt supervision and food preparation to reduce risk. Not all staff, including those working with babies, have received training in safe food preparation. This means that food is not always prepared in a way that promotes children's safety and wellbeing.

Staff support children to begin to understand and manage their emotions. For example, they have introduced a 'calm area' and resources to help children self-regulate. However, in the baby room, weaknesses in staff deployment mean that staff are not always able to respond promptly to children's care and emotional needs. As a result, some children receive reduced attention and supervision during routines and play. Staff do not consistently identify and manage risks effectively, and some resources are not suitable for children's age and stage of development. This exposes children to avoidable hazards, such as choking hazards from resources with small pieces.

Leadership and governance: Urgent improvement

Leaders have poor oversight of the setting. They have not ensured that statutory requirements are met, including those relating to safeguarding, safer eating and risk assessment. As a result, weaknesses in practice compromise children's safety and wellbeing. Leaders have not ensured that staff understand and implement policies and procedures consistently, including those relating to reporting concerns about children.

Leaders do not monitor the quality of teaching and care precisely enough. Weaknesses in staff deployment, supervision and teaching have not been identified or addressed effectively. As a result, staff practice is inconsistent and children's care, learning and safety are not supported well enough. Leaders do not ensure that staff are deployed effectively. Although overall ratios are met, staff are not deployed appropriately within rooms. For example, one member of staff was responsible for supervising a group of 10 toddlers at breakfast while also greeting parents, requiring them to leave children unsupervised.

Professional development is not sharply focused. While staff receive some training, this is not targeted effectively to address gaps in knowledge, including child development and safe food preparation. This means that staff do not have the expertise they need to carry out their roles effectively.

Leaders maintain communication with parents and share information about children's care and development. Staff report that leaders are supportive and consider their wellbeing. However, weaknesses in leadership and oversight mean that the setting is not providing a safe or consistently effective environment for children.

What the setting must and should do next

The provider must:

  • ensure all staff have a secure and accurate understanding of safeguarding procedures, including how to identify, report and manage concerns, allegations and issues of confidentiality (by 22 May 2026)
  • ensure that safer eating practices are consistently followed, including the safe preparation of food and the effective supervision of children while eating (by 22 May 2026)
  • improve risk assessment processes to ensure that all resources in the baby room are safe and suitable for children's age and stage of development (by 22 May 2026)
  • ensure that staff are deployed effectively at all times so that staffing arrangements meet children's needs and staff are able to carry out their roles without compromising children's care, safety and learning (by 22 May 2026)
  • review and organise daily routines to minimise unnecessary waiting times and ensure children have sufficient opportunities to engage in purposeful play and learning (by 22 May 2026)
  • strengthen monitoring and support for staff to ensure teaching and care are effectively adapted to meet children's individual needs and stages of development (by 22 May 2026)
  • strengthen the use of assessment to ensure that staff use accurate information about what children know and can do to shape learning experiences and support children's progress (by 22 May 2026)
  • improve leadership oversight and accountability to ensure policies, procedures and expectations are clearly understood and consistently implemented by all staff (by 22 May 2026)

Ofsted's words, from the report on the inspection on 23 April 2026. Read the full report on the Ofsted website. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Inspection history

  • 23 April 2026: Full inspection, report card: Needs attention in 4, Urgent improvement in 2
  • 20 November 2023: Full inspection, Good (report)
  • 10 August 2023: Actions after a concern (report)
  • 16 June 2023: Full inspection, Inadequate (report)
  • 16 July 2019: Full inspection, Good (report)
  • 15 March 2016: Inspection (report)

Ofsted report cards (England, from November 2025)

Since 10 November 2025 Ofsted has graded nurseries and pre-schools on a report card. There is no single overall grade. Instead, each of six areas gets one of five grades: Exceptional, Strong standard, Expected standard, Needs attention, Urgent improvement.

The six areas are inclusion; curriculum and teaching; achievement; behaviour, attitudes and establishing routines; children's welfare and wellbeing; leadership and governance. Safeguarding is judged on its own, as met or not met.

Expected standard means the setting does what Ofsted expects of every setting. Strong standard and Exceptional are above that; Needs attention and Urgent improvement mean Ofsted found things the setting has to put right.

Source: Ofsted reports

Funded childcare hours in England

All 3 and 4 year olds in England can get 15 hours of free childcare a week, for 38 weeks of the year.

Working parents of children aged 9 months to 4 years old can get 30 hours of free childcare a week for 38 weeks of the year (Free Childcare for Working Parents), if they meet the earnings rules. You confirm your details every 3 months.

Some 2 year olds can get 15 hours a week when the family gets certain kinds of extra support.

The hours are used at a registered provider that offers them, so ask each nursery how it offers the funded hours.

Source: GOV.UK: Free Childcare for Working Parents, check if you're eligible · GOV.UK: Free childcare and education for 2 to 4 year olds (checked 31 October 2026)

Other nurseries nearby

  • Workplace Nursery - Day nursery, Oldbury B69 3DE, ages 0 to 4, 80 places, 0.6 miles
    Ofsted, 6 August 2025: Good overall; safeguarding is effective
  • The Cradle Nursery - Day nursery, Oldbury, West Midlands B68 8RH, ages 1 to 3, 63 places, 0.7 miles
    Ofsted, 23 January 2025: Good overall; safeguarding is effective
  • Unicorn Day Nursery - Day nursery, Oldbury B69 1BP, ages 1 to 8, 74 places, 0.8 miles
    Ofsted report card, 6 May 2026: Expected standard in 4 areas, Needs attention in 2 areas; safeguarding standards met
  • Blossoms at Bloxcidge House - Day nursery, Oldbury B68 8QH, ages 0 to 4, 68 places, 0.9 miles
    Ofsted report card, 10 November 2025: Strong standard in 2 areas, Expected standard in 4 areas; safeguarding standards met
  • Little Feet Day Nursery - Day nursery, Oldbury B68 8HL, 24 places, 0.9 miles

Schools nearby

Minee Monkeys on the Ofsted website